Introduction:
The right to equality in the Indian Constitution (Article 14 to Article 18) is crucial. Everyone, no matter where they’re from, should have the same rights. This means they get the same chances and fair treatment. It’s the law that makes sure of this. In 1950, we made the Constitution. It states that everyone should treat each other equally. He was very important in creating the Constitution. This establishes equality as a fundamental right for every citizen of India.
Keshavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala (1973):
In 1973, the Supreme Court made a big decision in a case called Keshavananda Bharti vs. Kerala State. They said that Article 14, which promises everyone is treated the same. It is a very important part of the constitution. This decision helped shape how our country’s rules are supposed to work. This means that Article 14 holds a sacred position. Any attempt to modify or change it would compromise its essential character. Consequently, such alterations would be considered unconstitutional. Here are some key points:
Basic Structure Doctrine:
- In the case, they made a rule called the Basic Structure Doctrine. This rule says that some parts of the Constitution can’t be changed by the government. It’s like having important rules that can’t be broken.
Judicial Review:
- In this case, they said that judges have the power to check if new rules are okay. This means the judges can look at the new rules and decide if they follow the big rules of our country. It’s like having a group of people who make sure everyone plays by the right rules.
Fundamental Rights:
- The case clarified that Parliament cannot abrogate or alter fundamental rights.
Doctrine of Prospective Overruling:
- In this case, the court made a new idea called Prospective Overruling. This idea means a court decision only affects things that happen in the future. It’s like saying, “This is how things should be done from now on.”
Parliamentary Sovereignty:
- In this case, they said that Parliament is really important, but it can’t change everything. The judges made rules to say there are some things even Parliament can’t change. It’s like having big rules that even the most important people have to follow.
Amendment under Article 368:
- In this case, they talked about Article 368. They decided how to change the big rules of our country. It’s like making a plan for when we want to make our rules better.
Land Reform Laws:
- The court held that the state’s power to enact land reform laws is subject to fundamental rights.
Preamble:
- The judgment said the Preamble is really important in the Constitution.
Balance of Powers:
- The judgment stated that the three branches of government must maintain balance.
Secularism:
- The case highlighted secularism as a basic feature of the Constitution.
Indra Sawhney v. Union of India (1992):
In a big case called the Mandal Case in 1992, the Supreme Court talked about a rule for helping backward classes. They wanted to check if it’s okay to give some people extra help to make things fair. The court said it’s good to have extra help. It’s about being fair. Especially for those who didn’t get the same chances before. The decision teaches us to be fair. It says everyone should have the same chances. Especially those who had a tough time before.
Vishakha vs. State of Rajasthan (1997):
The Vishakha vs. State of Rajasthan case in 1997 was a superhero moment in stopping bad things at work. What happened to Bhanwari Devi sparked it. The Supreme Court made special rules called Vishakha guidelines. It was to fight against bad things at work . These rules, a bit like a fair play guidebook, wanted everyone to be happy and safe at work.
The Vishakha guidelines had special rules to stop bad things at work, like saying what is not okay. Employers, who are like the bosses, had to have plans to stop bad things and teach everyone about it. Every big workplace needed a team to help if someone felt unsafe, and they had to keep everything private.
The superhero move in 1997 made new rules in 2013 to keep work safe and fair for everyone. The Vishakha decision was like saying that workplaces should be safe and equal for ladies. It was an important step to make sure everyone feels good and secure at work.
Articles 15 and 16 – Prohibition of Discrimination: A step forward to right to equality
Article 15:
This article of the Indian Constitution prohibits discrimination on specific grounds. It states that the State shall not discriminate against any citizen on the grounds of religion, race, caste, sex, place of birth, or any of them. Additionally, it empowers the State to make special provisions for women and children. It also allows for the advancement of socially and educationally backward classes, Scheduled Castes, and Scheduled Tribes.”
Article 16:
Article 16 complements Article 15 and extends the principle of non-discrimination to matters of public employment. It ensures that every citizen have equal opportunities of employment or appointment to any office under the State. It’s clear that discrimination based on religion, race, caste, sex, origin, place of birth, residence, or any of these factors is not allowed.
Here are some land mark judgements:
State of Kerala v. N.M. Thomas (1976):
In an important decision in 1976, the Supreme Court talked about a rule called reservations in job promotions. They said it’s a good thing to give some people a chance to move up in their jobs. But the court also emphasized that it’s not only about fairness; it’s also about ensuring that people do their work well. The decision helped figure out how to be fair and do work effectively in the government. It made sure that everyone has a chance to do better in their jobs while keeping things running smoothly.
The Navtej Singh Johar case (2018):
The Navtej Singh Johar case is a big change in India’s laws that helped the LGBTQ+ community. It was about a rule, Section 377, that said some kinds of love were against the law. Navtej Singh Johar and others said this rule was not fair and went against their rights in the Constitution. The Supreme Court listened to the case and decided that this rule was not right. They made it clear that everyone, regardless of who they love, should ensure fair treatment and equal rights.
This decision is not just important for India but also for talking about LGBTQ+ rights around the world. The court’s decision helps make things better and fairer for everyone.
In conclusion, equality in the Indian Constitution isn’t a fixed idea. It changes and adapts to society’s needs. Despite progress, challenges remain, needing efforts from policymakers, civil society, and individuals.
While the Constitution sets equality’s foundation, making it real needs proactive steps. Policymakers must update laws to address new forms of discrimination. They need to keep up with social changes to make sure the laws stay fair. Civil society advocates for systemic changes and awareness about equality’s importance.
Everyone should try to be fair and not treat others differently. We should include everyone and be nice to each other. Making things equal is not just a rule, but it’s also like a promise to make India a good and fair place for everyone.
It means we have to get rid of things that make people not treated equally, like unfair rules. We should be happy that everyone is different and include everyone. If we know the problems and work together, India can become a fair and happy place for everyone.